ArticleEpilepsy & behavior reports2025
The challenges in establishing and Upholding an adult Level III epilepsy center in an underserved area in the United states.
Article in Epilepsy & behavior reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite vast improvement, even today, care of people with epilepsy (PWE) in many parts of the USA remains unevenly distributed and disjointed. We reviewed the experience of the Kern Medical Epilepsy Center (KMEC) to highlight the challenges in establishing and maintaining an epilepsy center in an underserved region of Southern California. We analyzed the prospectively collected data from 2018 through 2021 of KMEC, a National Association of Epilepsy Centers Level III accredited facility that serves PWE people residing in Central Valley, California. During the study period, there were 246 admissions to the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit, KMEC for detailed evaluation of difficult to treat epilepsy. Most patients were either of Hispanic descent or Caucasian. Thirty-seven patients underwent surgical interventions (8 resective surgery, and 23 vagus nerve stimulators and 6 responsive neurostimulators) with favorable outcomes in the majority. Many of them required referrals to the Level IV center at University of Southern California, Los Angeles, which were hindered by difficulties with getting appointments, transportation, insurance coverage, payment for treatment, and sluggish treatment processes. Our experience demonstrates that, despite considerable challenges, epilepsy care can be coordinated across complex and competing health systems separated by large geographic distances through creative, physician-driven strategies of resource sharing and goal alignment across the health care ecosystem. We hope that our experience will facilitate future efforts to integrate epilepsy care beyond this region in the USA, and elsewhere in the world. sluggish treatment processes. and elsewhere in the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.