ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2025
Risk factors of recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasm 2/3 after primary excisional conization/LEEP treatments: A follow-up nationwide cohort study.
Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Follow-up human papillomavirus (HPV) testing 6 months after treatment is suggested for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasm (CIN) 2/3. However, the Pap smear remains the only feasible tool in areas with limited resources. Our study aimed to evaluate the risk factors of recurrent CIN2/3 after excision treatment by follow-up Pap smear in a nationwide database. Methods: We retrospectively identified women receiving excision treatment for CIN2/3 from 2007 to 2016 in the Taiwan National Cervical Cancer Screening Database. Risk factors of recurrence including age, education status, follow-up frequency, and the results of serial follow-up Pap smears were analyzed. Results: In total, 11595 women were enrolled, 287 having recurrent CIN2 + diseases (cumulative incidence of recurrence of 24.8/1000 people). The incidence of recurrent CIN2 + lesions was highest in the over 60-year-old age group (12.12/1000 person-years). For the first follow-up Pap smear, the highest recurrence rate was in the AGC/HSIL+ group (106.6/1000 people). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that over 60 years of age, AGC/HSIL+ in the first follow-up pap smear, and any abnormal pap smear result within the first year after treatment were risk factors of CIN2/3 recurrence. Conclusions: In patients receiving excision for CIN2/3, the recurrence risk was higher in patients older than 60 years of age, and who had any abnormal follow-up Pap smear results, especially AGC/HSIL+ , in the first year after treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.