Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40491830›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2025

Health-related quality of life in patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy: a secondary analysis of the ORANGE II PLUS randomised controlled, phase 3, superiority trial.

Bram Olij, Robert S Fichtinger, Luca A Aldrighetti, Mohammad Abu Hilal, Roberto I Troisi, Robert P Sutcliffe, Marc G Besselink, Somaiah Aroori, Krishna V Menon, Bjørn Edwin and 24 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01441856 (The ORANGE II PLUS - Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01441856 nacompletednot on this map

The ORANGE II PLUS - Trial: an International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Open Versus Laparoscopic Hemihepatectomies.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaastricht University Medical CenterRan2013 to 2023Enrolled350ConditionsLiver Lesions Requiring HemihepatectomyArmsOpen or Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy, Open or Laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Small cuts, big impact: rethinking liver surgery.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

Bram OlijDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Robert S FichtingerDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Luca A AldrighettiHepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Mohammad Abu HilalDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan.
Roberto I TroisiDivision of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Robert P SutcliffeHPB and Liver Transplant Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Marc G BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Somaiah ArooriDepartment of Surgery, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Krishna V MenonDepartment of Liver Transplant and HPB Surgery, Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Bjørn EdwinIntervention Centre and Department of Hepatic, Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Mathieu D'HondtDepartment of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, AZ Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium.
Valerio LucidiDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Unit of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Transplantation, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Bruxelles, ULB-Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Tom F UlmerDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Rafael Díaz-NietoDepartment of Hepato-Biliary Surgery, Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Zahir SoonawallaDepartment of Surgery, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Steve WhiteDepartment of Surgery, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Gregory SergeantDepartment of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium.
Francesca RattiHepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Christoph KuemmerliUniversity Surgery and Perioperative and Critical Care Theme, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton / University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Vincenzo ScuderiDepartment for General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Frederik BerrevoetDepartment for General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Aude VanlanderDepartment for General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Ravi MarudanayagamHPB and Liver Transplant Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Pieter J TanisDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Maxime J L DewulfDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Zina B EmintonSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Ulf P NeumannDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Lloyd BrandtsDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Siân A PughDepartment of Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Åsmund A FretlandIntervention Centre and Department of Hepatic, Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Merel L KimmanDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
John N PrimroseUniversity Surgery and Perioperative and Critical Care Theme, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton / University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Ronald M van DamDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
ORANGE II PLUS Collaborative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become a critical factor in determining the benefits of new surgical approaches on patients. The ORANGE II PLUS randomised trial compared laparoscopic (LH) and open (OH) hemihepatectomy in an international multicentre randomised controlled setting, with HRQoL as a secondary outcome. The aim of this study was to perform an in-depth analysis of the HRQoL outcomes. Methods: Between October 2013 and January 2019, 352 patients scheduled for hemihepatectomy, were randomly assigned to either LH or OH in a 1:1-ratio in 16 European centres. HRQoL was assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LMC21 modules, at baseline, hospital discharge, and at 10-days, 3-, 6-, and 12-months after discharge. Differences in functioning- and five selected symptom scales were compared between LH and OH over the cumulative periods from discharge to 3 months as well as to 12 months using a multivariable adjusted linear mixed regression model. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01441856). Findings: The modified intention-to-treat analysis included 332 patients (166 LH and 166 OH), with 40% female in LH and 42% female in OH. 1546 questionnaires (81% of maximum) were obtained. Cumulatively over the period from discharge to 3 months postoperatively, patients in the laparoscopic group reported better physical (difference 4.20 points; 95% CI 1.07-7.34) and social functioning (5.95 points; 95% CI 1.65-10.26), and lower pain (-6.41 points, 95% CI -10.01 to -2.82) and appetite loss (-7.29 points, 95% CI -11.59 to -2.99), compared to the OH group. Similar clinically relevant, but slightly attenuated, differences were reported over the cumulative period from discharge to 12 months after surgery. The largest difference was observed at 10 days after surgery. Interpretation: In this international randomised trial evaluating HRQoL, LH demonstrated better physical and social functioning, and less pain and appetite loss, compared to OH. These findings support the preferential use of the laparoscopic approach for hemihepatectomy in experienced centres. Funding: Maastricht University Medical Centre+, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Cancer Research UK 12/048, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery, participating centres.

Indexed as

Laparoscopic hepatectomyQuality of lifeRCT

Identifiers

PMID40491830
PMCPMC12148447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.