ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
AITP-YOLO: improved tomato ripeness detection model based on multiple strategies.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- TomatoRipen-MMT: transformer-based RGB and NIR spectral fusion for tomato maturity grading.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- AFBF-YOLO: An Improved YOLO11n Algorithm for Detecting Bunch and Maturity of Cherry Tomatoes in Greenhouse Environments.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Precision citrus segmentation and stem picking point localization using improved YOLOv8n-seg algorithm.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Research on detection and counting method of wheat ears in the field based on YOLOv11-EDS.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Optimizing polymorphic tomato picking detection: improved YOLOv8n architecture to tackle data under complex environments.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This paper offers a multi-scale AITP-YOLO model, based on the enhanced YOLOv10s model, to address the challenges of difficult identification and frequent misdetection of tomatoes, facilitating ripeness detection under realistic conditions. Methods: A four-head detector incorporates a small target detection layer, enhancing the model's capacity to identify small targets. Secondly, a multi-scale feature fusion technique employing cross-level features is implemented in the feature fusion layer to amalgamate convolutions of varying sizes, enhancing the model's fusion capacity and generalization proficiency for features of diverse scales. The bounding box loss function is modified to Shape-IoU, with the loss computed by emphasizing the shape and scale of the bounding box, hence enhancing the precision of bounding box regression, expediting model convergence, and augmenting model correctness. Ultimately, the model is compressed via Network Slimming puring,which removes redundant channels while mataining detection accuracy. Results: The experimental findings indicate that the enhanced model achieves average precision, accuracy, and recall of 92.6%, 89.7%, and 87.4%, respectively. In comparison to the baseline network YOLOv10s, the model weights are compressed by 7.64%, while average precision, accuracy, and recall are elevated by 4.6%, 5.8%, and 7.3%, respectively. Discussion: The enhanced model features a reduced model size while exhibiting superior detection capabilities, enabling more efficient and precise recognition of tomato stages amidst complicated backgrounds, hence offering a valuable technical reference for automated tomato harvesting technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.