Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40491771›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2025

Bystander availability, CPR uptake, and AED use during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

David B Sidebottom, Robyn Painting, Charles D Deakin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David B SidebottomSouth Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Robyn PaintingSouth Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Charles D DeakinSouth Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation of a shockable rhythm improve survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Little data exists on bystander participation during genuine cardiac arrest calls. Method: This was a prospective audit of bystander participation during OHCA calls to a single ambulance service in the United Kingdom. A convenience sample of consecutive OHCA calls from March 2022 until April 2023, where an adult cardiac arrest was confirmed and CPR was advised, was audited by a call handler. Cases with a valid do not attempt CPR decision were excluded. Data on key time intervals and bystander participation were extracted and analysed in R (v4.2). Results: In total, 451 cases were analysed. Median time until cardiac arrest recognition was 42 s (IQR 94.7 s) and until the initiation of CPR was 161 s (IQR 124 s). A lone bystander was present in 162 (35.9%) cases, two bystanders in 149 (33.0%) cases, and three or more bystanders in 140 (31.0%) cases. CPR was attempted by a bystander in 382 (84.7%) cases. Physical inability, refusal, and inability to correctly position patient were common reasons for not performing CPR. A defibrillator was retrieved before the arrival of emergency medical services in 36 (8%) cases and a shock was administered in 9 (2%) cases, while a shock was not advised in 20 (4%) further cases. Conclusion: Cardiac arrest was identified rapidly but there was a delay to initiation of CPR. A lone bystander was present in over one third of cases, eliminating the possibility of bystander defibrillation in the absence of a lay first responder.

Indexed as

AuditBystanderCardiac arrestCardiopulmonary resuscitationDefibrillationLaypeopleLayperson

Identifiers

PMID40491771
PMCPMC12148603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.