ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Clinical significance of risk factor analysis in pancreatic cancer by using supervised model of machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pancreatic cancer (PC) poses a significant global health challenge due to its aggressive nature, late-stage diagnosis, and high mortality despite advancements in treatment. Early detection remains crucial for timely intervention. This study aimed to identify clinically relevant predictors of pancreatic cancer using a supervised machine learning approach and to develop a risk stratification tool with diagnostic capabilities. Methods: A matched case-control study was conducted retrospectively at the Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University (2017-2023), involving 353 cases and 370 matched controls. Demographic and hematological data were extracted from medical records. Variables were pre-selected using cluster dendrograms and subsequently refined using logistic regression with backward elimination and Support Vector Machine (SVM) models. A final risk scoring model was developed based on the best-performing model and internally validated. Results: Key predictors retained in the final logistic regression model included Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (OR 1.28; 95% CI: 1.08-1.52), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 1.01-1.03), CA19-9 (OR 1.01; 95% CI: 1.01-1.01), Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) (OR 1.41; 95% CI: 1.20-1.66), and Body Mass Index (BMI) (OR 0.88; 95% CI: 0.81-0.97). The final model demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.969, Conclusion: HbA1c, ALP, CA19-9, CEA, and BMI were independently associated with pancreatic cancer. The machine learning-derived risk scoring model demonstrated high predictive accuracy and may serve as a valuable clinical tool for early detection and screening of pancreatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.