ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2025
Head posture control under perturbed conditions in progressive supranuclear palsy patients.
Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In neurodegenerative brain diseases like Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP), clinical studies underscore the crucial role of head motion deficits. Similarly, advanced stage Idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) is known to display significantly altered posture control and balance patterns involving the head segment. Methods: This study investigates the relative differences in head control during a perturbed upright stance paradigm between patients affected by PSP and IPD, compared to healthy control subjects using dynamic system modeling. The resulting neural model underlines how PSP primarily affects head control, whereas IPD primarily affects the control of the whole body's center of mass. A neck control model, based on the hypothesis of modular posture control, is proposed to emulate the PSP data in particular. Results: A larger passive stiffness was observed for both groups of patients, with eyes closed, suggesting that the head moves together with the trunk. With eyes open, the active proportional gain KP is relatively larger in all cases, indicating that the head is directed closer to the vertical by the visual contribution. Since this was held for all investigated groups, findings support the notion of intact visual contribution to posture control among PSP and IPD despite the impaired supranuclear eye guidance among PSP. Discussion: The proposed neural model's characteristics will aid in future patient data analysis, disease progression monitoring, and possible modulation of disease-specific features through therapeutic intervention. For engineering and robotics implementations, uses for strengthened resilience of head stabilization are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.