ReviewBioactive materials2025
Advancement in smart bone implants: the latest multifunctional strategies and synergistic mechanisms for tissue repair and regeneration.
Review in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomaterials for intervertebral disc regeneration: Niche reprogramming, precision therapeutics, and structural reconstruction.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- Ultrasonic-driven force-electric nanodomains orchestrate lysosome-to-mitochondria functional cascade to accelerate bone regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- A multiscale pathoanatomical atlas guides the design of functionally graded, anatomically intelligent implants for chronic osteomyelitis.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- From Smart Hydrogel Design to 4D-Printed Scaffolds: Emerging Paradigms in Precision Drug Delivery and Regenerative Wound Therapy.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The messenger ion: magnesium ion coordinates bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells-mediated osteogenesis, migration, and angiogenesis via the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- Hierarchical biomimetic scaffold with directional guidance and photothermal properties for the repair of critical-sized bone defects.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Article
- Emerging non-antibiotic strategies for implant-associated biofilm infections by reprogramming the dysregulated immune microenvironment.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Review
- Pitaya‑inspired compartmentalized microspheres with natural tannic acid-copper coating orchestrate smart release of ions and multi-drugs for synergistic treatment of infected bone defects.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- GeneCytNet: an interpretable deep learning framework for rheumatoid arthritis classification andFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- A methodological approach to improve extracellular staphylococcal clearance in internalization assays using bone-associated host-cell models of orthopedic infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- The bidirectional role of neutrophils in the regulation of bone metabolism: a review of research progress and mechanism.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial implants have consistently been recognized as the most effective clinical strategy for repairing bone fractures and defects, particularly in orthopedics and stomatology. Nowadays, the focus of bone repair has shifted from basic fixation and structural restoration to the reconstruction of multifunctional "live" tissue to mimic the natural bone microenvironment. However, developing the smart implants with ideal osteogenesis-related multi-functions remains challenging, as the effects of physicochemical properties of implant materials on intracellular signaling, stem cell niches, and tissue regeneration are not yet fully understood. Herein, we systematically explore recent advancements in innovative strategies for bone repair and regeneration, revealing the significance of the smart implants that closely mimic the natural structure and function of bone tissue. Adaptation to patient-oriented osteogenic microenvironments, dynamic osteoblastogenesis-osteoclastogenesis balance, antibacterial/bactericidal capacity, vascularization, and osteoimmunomodulatory capacity and their regulatory mechanisms achieved by biomaterials design and functional modifications are thoroughly summarized and analyzed. Notably, the popular research on multifunctional platforms with synergetic interactions between different functions and treatment of complex clinical issues, including the emerging neurogenic bone repair, is also significantly discussed for developing more intelligent implants. By summarizing recent research efforts, this review proposes the latest multifunctional strategies and synergistic mechanisms of smart bone implants, aiming to provide better bone defect repair applications that more closely mimic the natural bone tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.