ArticleBioactive materials2025
An "inside-out"-guided genetically engineered hydrogel for augmenting aged bone regeneration.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms and therapeutic potential of mitochondrial-targeted therapies in bone repair.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- Injectable hydrogels for bone regeneration: from materials design to clinical translation.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Hydrogel Implementing Drug Delivery in Cranial Bone Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Bioactive hydrogels for bone tissue engineering: Design strategies, bioactive cargo delivery, and artificial intelligence-assisted clinical translation.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2026Review
- Biomaterial-assisted gene therapy for bone repair.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Enzyme-Integrated Hydrogels for Advanced Biological Applications.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Biomaterials targeting senescent cells for bone regeneration: State-of-the-art and future perspectives.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Senescent bone repair faces significant obstacles due to reduced cellular activity and an unfavorable microenvironment, both of which hinder the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSCs) into osteoblasts (OBs) and subsequent bone formation. Current approaches primarily target senescent cell clearance (senolytics) or suppression of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (senomorphics), neglecting the complex interactions between BMSCs and the osteogenic microenvironment. In this study, a genetically engineered hydrogel incorporating NAD-dependent deacetylase sirtuins 3 (SIRT3)-loaded nano-vectors and poly (glycerol sebacate)-co-poly (ethylene glycol)/polyacrylic acid (PEGS/PAA) was developed as an "inside-out" strategy for bone regeneration. At the intracellular level, BMSC function is restored, and osteogenesis is promoted through genetically enhanced SIRT3 expression. At the extracellular level, carboxyl functional groups chelate iron ions, simulating a hypoxic environment and promoting synergistic interactions between angiogenesis and osteogenesis. The therapeutic effects of the genetically engineered hydrogel in alleviating senescent damage and enhancing osteogenic differentiation were confirmed in both chemically and naturally induced senescence models
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.