Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40491670›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2025

Adolescent motherhood and the development of adolescent Offspring: Examining the role of selection versus early environmental factors.

Emla Fitzsimons, Aase Villadsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emla FitzsimonsCentre for Longitudinal Studies, University College London, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, United Kingdom.
Aase VilladsenCentre for Longitudinal Studies, University College London, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The study examines the adolescent developmental outcomes in education, mental health, and physical health of children born to teenage mothers at the start of the millennium. Objective: It aims to understand the extent to which long-term developmental outcomes of children born to adolescent mothers are due to selection effects versus other factors. Methods: It uses longitudinal data from the UK Millennium Cohort Study. Multivariate regressions examine the extent to which the association between maternal age at birth and adolescent outcomes is explained by selection into teenage motherhood, and how the relationship is mediated by the early environment and maternal behaviours. Results: Teenage mothers are disadvantaged in terms of their backgrounds, and their children faced more adversity in their early environment. An unadjusted comparison shows that their adolescent offspring have lower academic achievement, and are more likely to be overweight or obese, but there are no differences in their socio-emotional adjustment. The 'penalty' from teenage motherhood in excess weight is due to negative selection into teenage motherhood. However, the differences in educational attainment of adolescents born to teenage and older mothers reflect both pre-childbearing selection and differences in the child's early environment. A decomposition analysis shows that maternal age accounts for only a low proportion of the variance in adolescent development. Contribution: The study provides the first evidence on long-term outcomes of children born to teenage mothers for the UK. It studies the entire range of key developmental outcomes. It uses a novel decomposition to examine the relative importance of different variables for explaining variation in the outcomes of interest.

Indexed as

Adolescent mothersAdolescent outcomesLongitudinal dataMillennium cohort study

Identifiers

PMID40491670
PMCPMC12148460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.