Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40491667›Full record

ReviewBJA open2025

Perioperative and persistent opioid use after surgery: a scoping review.

Bader Almodibeg, Jungwoo Kang, Patrice Forget

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bader AlmodibegAnaesthesia and Operation Technology Department, King Khalid University, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Khamis Mushait, Asir, Saudi Arabia.
Jungwoo KangAberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health (Epidemiology Group), University of Aberdeen - School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Foresterhill Health Campus, Aberdeen, UK.
Patrice ForgetAberdeen Centre for Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Health (Epidemiology Group), University of Aberdeen - School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Foresterhill Health Campus, Aberdeen, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Persistent opioid use after surgery is a growing concern, with existing reviews lacking strong predictors beyond prior opioid use. This scoping review aimed to identify knowledge gaps for future research, particularly regarding the impact of the perioperative period (including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) opioid use on persistent opioid use after surgery. A comprehensive database search of prospective studies explored the association between perioperative opioid use and persistent use in adults after surgery. From the 21 identified studies, we found a complex relationship between perioperative opioid use and persistent use. Preoperative opioid use correlated with persistent use, but the impact of intraoperative and short-term postoperative use remained unclear. Interestingly, postoperative prescriptions at 3 months predicted a higher risk of persistent use at 6 and 12 months. These findings highlight the need for further research to explore the mediating factors that increase the risk of persistent use among preoperative opioid users, along with the specific roles of intraoperative and postsurgical inpatient opioid consumption, and short-term postoperative opioid prescriptions (≤30 days).

Indexed as

intraoperative opioidopioid crisisperioperative opioidpersistent opioidpostoperative opioidpreoperative opioid

Identifiers

PMID40491667
PMCPMC12148373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.