ArticleInternational journal of nephrology and renovascular disease2025
Adherence to Treatment Regimens Among End-Stage Renal Disease Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effect of an Educational Program Based on Orem's Self-care Model on Treatment Adherence, Self-care Behaviors, and Quality of Life in Hemodialysis Patients in Iran: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2026Trial
- Association Between Pain Self-Efficacy and Adherence to Hemodialysis Regimen.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Development and Validation of the Treatment Adherence Scale for Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients in China: A Mixed-Methods Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Factors Contributing to Non-Adherence to Treatment Among Adult Patients with Long-Term Haemodialysis: An Integrative Review.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Adherence to treatment regimens is crucial to enhance the clinical outcomes of patients with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD). In Yemen, there is a gap in information about this issue. Hence, this study aimed to assess the adherence and associated factors of ESRD patients to the four adherence domains, including HD session attendance, medication, dietary modification, and fluid management. Patients and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study of ESRD patients was conducted. End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire (ESRD-AQ) was used to collect data through face-to-face interviews. The scoring system was used. The mean of the gained scores was calculated and divided by expected maximum scores and the resulting percentage was used to rank the level of adherence as good ≥ 83%, moderate ≥58- <83% and poor <58%). Non-parametric tests to assess the mean differences with selected variables at p-value <0.005. Results: The overall (mean ±SD) scores of 393 patients for the four adherence domains (HD, medication, fluid restrictions, and dietary recommendations) were 933.5+210 indicating an overall moderate level of adherence. Good adherence to HD and moderate adherence to medication, diet and fluids were observed (88.5%, 76.7%, 61.9%, and 61.6%, respectively). Significantly higher mean scores among patients with urban residency (941.8 vs 869.4, p=0.03), HD duration < 5 years (949.2 vs 908.0, p=0.02), the overall perception of treatment (956.7 vs 653.3, p=<0.001), patients who had a perception of medication (942.0 vs 734.3, p=0.002), fluid restriction (958.9 vs 727.3, p=<0.001), and diet recommendations (969.8 vs 715.2, p=<0.001). Significantly lower mean scores were observed among patients who had not received counseling regarding the importance of dietary and fluid restriction (962.8 vs 920.5, p=0.02) and (965.6 vs 919.0, p=0.02, respectively). Discussion: This study is the first in our country to provide baseline information on adherence toward different treatment domains and their associated factors among patients with ESRD. The adherence level among patients with ESRD was moderate in general and good for HD. There was a significant association between adherence and residency, HD duration, overall perception of treatment, perception of medication, fluid and dietary restrictions, and poor counseling. Regular counseling should be provided to enhance adherence levels. A multicenter study is recommended to assess the causal relationship between adherence and the factors affecting adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.