Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40491657›Full record

ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2025

Posterior Malleolus: Morphologic Classification, Morphometry, and Clinical Insights.

Hellen Carvalho Ribeiro, William Paganini Mayer, Jacob Matz, Josemberg da Silva Baptista

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hellen Carvalho RibeiroDepartment of Morphology, Federal University of Espirito Santo (UFES), Vitoria, ES, Brazil.
William Paganini MayerLaboratory of Applied Morphology (LEMA-UFES), Vitoria, ES, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8450-6767
Jacob MatzDalhousie Medicine New Brunswick (DMNB), Saint John, NB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3842-2052
Josemberg da Silva BaptistaDepartment of Morphology, Federal University of Espirito Santo (UFES), Vitoria, ES, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0514-8170

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In this study, we provide a comprehensive description of the morphometrics of the distal tibiae and propose that the intact posterior malleolus (PM) exhibits clinically relevant morphologic variation. These differences may have implications for fracture classification, fixation strategy, and implant design. Methods: Fifty-two isolated dry tibias were analyzed to determine the PM morphometric parameters. Five key morphometric points were identified, and the PM was defined as the posterior bony projection of the distal tibial epiphysis. The malleolar groove established the PM's medial limitation, the posterior portion of the fibular notch defined the lateral limit, and the anterior boundary was a line connecting these landmarks across the inferior articular surface. PM shapes were categorized based on consistent morphologic patterns. Cross-sections of the distal tibia were performed to assess trabecular bone morphology and density. Results: We found the PM presenting 3 distinct morphologic types: rounded, triangular, and trapezoid. Triangular and trapezoid types exhibited larger dimensions and robust bone tissue, whereas tibias with a rounded PM displayed smaller dimensions and delicate bone architecture. Conclusion: These novel findings reveal PM morphologic diversity, which may enhance our understanding of PM fracture patterns and optimize the development of surgical implants.

Indexed as

ankle fractureankle injuryankle jointposterior malleolus fracturetibia

Identifiers

PMID40491657
PMCPMC12146590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.