ReviewCureus2025
Effects of Socioeconomic Status on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Clinical Outcome Differences Among Asian American Populations: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Associated with Ever Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Testing Among Adults in the United States.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Socioeconomic disparities in survival of patients with superficial colorectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Red-Wine Gene Networks Linked to Exceptional Longevity in Humans.Biomolecules · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer death among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (API) in the United States. Race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES) are known to impact outcomes of CRC, but the relationship is unclear in the context of the Asian American cohort and its diverse subgroups. This systematic review aims to gain insight into the relationship between CRC incidence and clinical outcomes in the Asian American community. A systematic literature search was conducted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) protocol using PubMed, Scopus, Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), Cochrane, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Web of Science databases, accessed on August 13, 2023. Of the 2225 studies identified, a total of 14 studies were included in the analysis. Four studies concluded that there was no association or variable response subgroup-specific to SES measurements in CRC incidence in the Asian American population. However, there was evidence that the incidence of CRC varies among Asian American subgroups, using varying measures of SES. Seven of the eight studies that measured mortality or survival as the primary outcome found decreased mortality and increased survival in the API population despite changes in SES. Out of the six studies that measured incidence, four studies found no association with SES. A study found that Chinese Americans had a significant decrease in the CRC incidence and mortality across all SES categories. Japanese Americans experienced a significant decrease in the lowest SES category, while Koreans and Filipinos experienced a significant increase in both the lowest and highest SES categories. Therefore, grouping various Asian American ethnicities as a single monolithic "Asian" category is misleading. Although the incidence of CRC was thought to be low and decreasing, this review identified various subgroup-specific trends among 24 different Asian American subsets. For example, there was a decrease in CRC rates in two ethnic groups and an increase in the other two ethnic groups. The potential causes of these varying CRC incidence rates are likely multifactorial and may include inadequate screening rates, lack of CRC education, and cultural barriers. Further studies are needed to understand these mechanisms. This review recommends a more detailed classification of the API ethnic population but not as a single monolithic entity as Asian. It also emphasizes preventative CRC screening within the API communities due to lower rates of CRC screening among them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.