ArticleCureus2025
Evaluation of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With a Natural Band (Sewefy Wrap): Results From a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most popular bariatric surgery procedure. Adding a synthetic band to LSG is reported to decrease the incidence of weight regain. However, the synthetic material has many drawbacks. This study aimed to evaluate the use of a natural flap as a band with LSG. Methods This study was a prospective, randomized controlled trial and included 80 patients with morbid obesity. It was conducted in the Minia University Hospital between November 2022 and February 2024. Participants were equally and randomly assigned to two groups. In one group, the patients underwent LSG and banding using either the Teres ligament (the round ligament of the liver) or a tight omental flap. In the second group, the standard LSG procedure was carried out without any band. Results The mean follow-up period was 13.5 months. At one year, the mean gastric volume was significantly less in the banded group (110.7 ml) than in the non-banded group (147.3 ml; p=0.000), and the mean % excess weight loss (EWL) was significantly higher in former (85.8%) than in the latter group (79.5; p=0.002). Similarly, the mean % total weight loss (TWL) was also significantly higher in the banded group (41.3%) than in the non-banded group (36.7%; p=0.010). Moreover, the mean score of food tolerance was 20.8 in the banded group versus 21.1 in the non-banded one (p=0.172). Conclusions LSG along with the a natural band using a nearby flap like the round ligament of the liver or an omental flap leads to better weight loss than non-banded LSG. It is also associated with minimal pouch dilatation and a low complication rate. The use of this technique is, hence, a promising procedure that minimizes sleeve pouch dilatation (the main cause of weight regain after LSG) without any extra cost or complications associated with a foreign body. However, long-term follow-up for this procedure is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.