ArticleCureus2025
A Study on the Accuracy of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Management of Necrotizing Fasciitis.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic strategies in necrotizing soft tissue infections: from clinical scores to multi-omics and machine learning.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rapidly progressive, life-threatening soft tissue infection with high mortality rates. Early diagnosis and prompt surgical intervention are crucial for survival, yet the initial diagnosis remains challenging due to nonspecific early presentations. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in identifying NF and its utility in guiding clinical management decisions. Methods This prospective observational study included 85 patients with suspected NF at a tertiary care center in India from April 2023 to April 2025. Trained emergency physicians performed POCUS examinations using high-frequency linear transducers and low-frequency curvilinear transducers when necessary. Sonographic findings were documented and correlated with surgical observations, clinical outcomes, and laboratory parameters. Primary outcomes included POCUS diagnostic accuracy, the need for surgical intervention, and mortality rates. Results The study population had a mean age of 50.2 years, with male predominance (62.4%) and primarily lower limb involvement (77.6%). POCUS demonstrated high positivity (97.6%) with predominantly fluid collection (77.6%), the loss of vascularity (65.9%), and fascial thickening (52.9%). Sensitivity was highest for fascial thickening (97.1%) and fluid collection (92.5%). Most required multiple debridements (83.5%), with 43.5% undergoing three procedures. At three-week follow-up, 25.9% achieved partial recovery and 18.8% complete recovery, with 15.3% mortality. Complications included amputation (11.8%), sepsis (9.4%), and wound infection (8.2%). POCUS assessment at three weeks showed persistent changes in 36.5% of patients despite clinical improvement in many cases. Conclusion POCUS is a highly sensitive diagnostic tool for NF with excellent correlation to surgical findings. Its immediate availability, non-invasive nature, and repeatability position it as a valuable adjunct in the initial assessment and monitoring of this life-threatening condition. The integration of POCUS into standard assessment protocols for suspected NF can expedite diagnosis, guide surgical interventions, and improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.