Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40491621›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Postural Adaptations of the Spinopelvic Parameters in the Sagittal Plane Induced by the Use of High-Heeled Shoes in a Sample of Young Healthy Female Subjects: A Pilot Study.

Saverio Colonna, Corrado Borghi, Eleonora Canova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saverio ColonnaRehabilitation Medicine, Spine Center, Bologna, ITA.
Corrado BorghiResearch and Development, Osteopathic Spine Center Education, Bologna, ITA.
Eleonora CanovaResearch, Spine Center, Bologna, ITA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This pilot study aimed to investigate postural adaptations in spinopelvic parameters on the sagittal plane following the use of high-heeled shoes over a prolonged period in a population of healthy young women. Thirty-four female participants were assessed using rasterstereography at three time points: standing barefoot (T1), immediately after wearing their own high-heeled shoes (T2), and after two consecutive hours of standing or walking while wearing the shoes (T3). The evaluation focused on trunk inclination, pelvic tilt, lumbar lordotic angle, and thoracic kyphotic angle. Participants were also stratified into two subgroups based on self-reported history of low back pain (LBP) during high-heel use: 13 symptomatic and 21 asymptomatic individuals.  The statistical analysis, conducted using both parametric and non-parametric tests due to the borderline normality of the data, revealed no significant postural changes between T2 and T3, nor any relevant differences between the two subgroups. Only a modest variation in the kyphotic angle was observed between T1 and T3, which may not be clinically relevant. Notably, none of the participants reported pain after the two-hour protocol. These findings suggest that, in inexperienced users, high-heeled shoes do not induce significant spinopelvic compensations or acute lumbar discomfort following moderate-duration use. As this is the first study to evaluate postural outcomes after sustained use rather than immediate heel elevation, further research with larger and more diverse samples is warranted to better elucidate the potential role of heel-induced adaptations in the etiology of LBP.

Indexed as

anterior pelvic tilthigh heelslow back painlumbar lordotic anglepostural adaptationsraster-stereographyspinopelvic profile

Identifiers

PMID40491621
PMCPMC12146676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.