ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Sport can do better: female athletes' perspectives on managing menstrual and hormonal contraceptive cycle-related symptoms.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessing the accuracy, reliability, and validity of menstrual cycle phase tracking equations in an applied sport setting.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- The impact of menstrual cycle phase and symptoms on sleep, recovery, and stress in elite female basketball athletes: a longitudinal study.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Menstrual cycle-related symptoms (MCS) affect female athletes' wellbeing, quality of life, sports participation, and performance. Hormonal contraceptives (HCs) moderate hormone activity, but do not necessarily alleviate MCS. Recent research indicates no significant effect of the MC or HC cycle on measurable performance, yet perceived effects on performance and wellbeing remain noticeable. Thus, this study aimed to understand how female athletes are impacted by and manage MCS, and how they want these symptoms addressed in sporting contexts. Methods: Using a constructivist paradigm approach, experiences and perspectives of 30 female athletes [aged 19-32, 18 naturally cycling (NC) and 12 using HCs] from 17 sports were gathered through semi-structured interviews and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Four main themes were identified: (1) significant impacts of MCS on athletes, (2) perceived functional difference when MCS are present, (3) uncertainty about the effectiveness of management strategies despite trying multiple options, and (4) a desire for a supportive sport environment with meaningful discussions about MCS, though there is reticence. Discussion: These findings highlight the need to view MCS as more than a minor inconvenience, consider athletes' perceptions, and pursue more research on evidence-based management options and MC culture change in sports. Regardless of the sport, it is crucial to advocate for athlete-centred training loads and schedules that can improve the overall experience of athletes enduring MCS, helping them continue to participate in sport and perform at their best.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.