Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40491565›Full record

ArticleCase reports in perinatal medicine2025

Research on the effectiveness of CMA and WES results in pregnant females with US findings and normal karyotype results from conventional karyotype analysis.

Masum Kayapınar, Zafer Bütün, Ece Akça Salık, Sinem Kocagil, Ezgi Susam

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in perinatal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Masum KayapınarDepartment of Perinatology, Private Clinic, Mersin, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6638-1940
Zafer BütünDepartment of Perinatology, Private Clinic, Eskişehir, Türkiye.
Ece Akça SalıkEskişehir City Hospital, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eskişehir, Türkiye.
Sinem KocagilEskişehir Osmangazi University, Genetic, Eskişehir, Türkiye.
Ezgi SusamSakarya Research and Education Hospital, Genetic, Sakarya, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: With the advancement of next-generation sequencing (NGS), whole-exome sequencing (WES) has proven useful in diagnosing various diseases, particularly neurodevelopmental disorders, during both the prenatal and postnatal periods. In this study, we examined the correlation between the results of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and WES in pregnant women, as compared to conventional karyotype analysis and ultrasound (US) findings. Methods: Fetal US were performed on pregnant females referred to our clinic with suspected fetal anomalies, as well as those who had anomalies detected by targeted US. Comprehensive counseling was provided to all parents. Karyotyping, CMA, and WES were offered for all fetuses through amniocentesis, CVS, and cordocentesis. We compared the demographic data and ultrasound findings of pregnant females with normal and abnormal WES results. Results: WES results indicated a normal karyotype in 14 pregnant females and an abnormal karyotype in 12 pregnant females. CMA showed an abnormal karyotype in three of the pregnant females, whose WES results were normal. US findings were more frequently observed in pregnant females with abnormal WES results. Conclusions: Among the organ systems, the cardiac system is at the highest risk for anomalies. The risk further increases when multiple system anomalies are present. Incorporating WES alongside CMA may enhance diagnostic accuracy and be beneficial for subsequent pregnancies. Our US results do not align with the existing literature, and further evaluations with larger patient populations are needed to reconcile these findings with current research.

Indexed as

chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA)conventional karyotypenext-generation sequencing (NGS)whole-exome sequencing (WES)

Identifiers

PMID40491565
PMCPMC12147533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.