ArticleCase reports in perinatal medicine2025
Research on the effectiveness of CMA and WES results in pregnant females with US findings and normal karyotype results from conventional karyotype analysis.
Article in Case reports in perinatal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: With the advancement of next-generation sequencing (NGS), whole-exome sequencing (WES) has proven useful in diagnosing various diseases, particularly neurodevelopmental disorders, during both the prenatal and postnatal periods. In this study, we examined the correlation between the results of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and WES in pregnant women, as compared to conventional karyotype analysis and ultrasound (US) findings. Methods: Fetal US were performed on pregnant females referred to our clinic with suspected fetal anomalies, as well as those who had anomalies detected by targeted US. Comprehensive counseling was provided to all parents. Karyotyping, CMA, and WES were offered for all fetuses through amniocentesis, CVS, and cordocentesis. We compared the demographic data and ultrasound findings of pregnant females with normal and abnormal WES results. Results: WES results indicated a normal karyotype in 14 pregnant females and an abnormal karyotype in 12 pregnant females. CMA showed an abnormal karyotype in three of the pregnant females, whose WES results were normal. US findings were more frequently observed in pregnant females with abnormal WES results. Conclusions: Among the organ systems, the cardiac system is at the highest risk for anomalies. The risk further increases when multiple system anomalies are present. Incorporating WES alongside CMA may enhance diagnostic accuracy and be beneficial for subsequent pregnancies. Our US results do not align with the existing literature, and further evaluations with larger patient populations are needed to reconcile these findings with current research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.