ArticleRegenerative therapy2025
Mapping intellectual structures and research hotspots of chronic wound in global perspective.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal decoding of skin biology: development, aging, disease, and regeneration.Burns & trauma · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic wounds included but were not limited to diabetes foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers and pressure ulcers. The challenge of difficult healing placed a heavy burden on patients and society. Our objective was to explain the healing process of chronic wounds and the development of treatment technologies in the past few years and to provide relevant, valuable information. Methods: Our scientific publications were retrieved from the core collection of the Web of Science (WoSCC) database collection. The bibliometric visualization and analysis were performed by the software Biblioshiny based on R-bibliometrix. VOSviewer software and Citespace software were responsible for the validation of the results. Results: A total of 8129 articles related to wound healing in chronic wounds were retrieved. The countries, institutions, and journals with the highest number of publications were the USA, the N8 research partnership, and the Journal of Wound Care, respectively. Armstrong DG and Dumville JC were the most influential authors in this field. The keyword analysis showed two key clusters of keywords, including "dressings" and "management". Trend topics analysis revealed frequent keywords in recent years, including "nanofibers" and "injectable hydrogels". Conclusion: Our research was the first to reveal the cellular and molecular mechanisms and key clinical management strategies in the healing process of chronic wounds in the future through metrological and systematic evaluation, which may have important translational value in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.