ArticleJHLT open2025
Survival of patients with advanced chronic lung allograft dysfunction and the role of redo transplantation.
Article in JHLT open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lung transplantation in 2025: a narrative review of progress, challenges, and the road ahead.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Article
- Long-term monthly mesenchymal stromal cell therapy for advanced chronic lung allograft dysfunction: a single-centre safety and feasibility cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Characteristics and Outcomes of 1500 Lung Transplantations in the Leuven Lung Transplant Program: Turning Past Lessons Into Tomorrow's Foundations.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lung transplantation (LTx) is a treatment option for end-stage lung disease. Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) poses challenges to long-term survival. CLAD is usually progressive with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Advanced CLAD is the most common indication for redo lung transplantation (LRT). Decision-making on LRT varies between centers. Methods: This study aimed to explore key aspects of advanced CLAD management, with a focus on disparities in redo transplantation referral and listing rates. A retrospective cohort study was conducted across follow-up clinics at 2 major European centers, examining patient characteristics, treatment approaches, clinical outcomes, and prognostic factors in individuals with advanced CLAD. Results: In a cohort of 177 patients with advanced CLAD, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome was the predominant phenotype (66%). Significant morbidity was observed, with 66% of patients severely disabled and 49% on oxygen therapy. Over a median follow-up of 568 days, 94 patients died, with a 2-year survival rate of only 25%. LRT was pursued in 72 patients, with 31 undergoing the procedure. Post-LRT mortality was high (48%), particularly in patients requiring advanced respiratory support. Key risk factors for mortality included restrictive or mixed CLAD phenotypes (hazard ratio [HR] 2.759), rapid disease progression (HR 49.671), and urgent LRT (HR 0.026). Conclusions: Advanced CLAD patients face high morbidity and mortality. Redo transplantation seems to offer survival benefit in elective patients. Early referral for redo transplantation and proactive management strategies are essential for improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.