ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Novel CT-based classification of Hoffa fracture and optimal treatment strategies.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The imaging characteristics of Hoffa fracture are gradually changing, leading to limitations of the existing classification system and necessitating the development of a novel classification system to guide clinical management. Objective: This study proposes a novel classification method for Hoffa fracture through a retrospective analysis of CT imaging characteristics, biomechanical studies, and case reports and suggests corresponding surgical approaches and internal fixation methods. Method: The CT imaging characteristics of 115 adults with Hoffa fractures from five tertiary hospitals were analyzed, accompanied by a retrospective review of biomechanical studies and case reports, to propose a novel classification system. Corresponding surgical approaches and internal fixation methods were recommended. Six independent observers evaluated the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the novel classification system. Results: The new classification method includes four broad types, and the recommended surgical approach and fixation strategy for each type have been identified. The mean Kappa coefficients for the first and second rounds of inter-observer were 0.766 and 0.752, respectively, with a mean Kappa coefficient for intra-observer of 0.853. Conclusion: The proposed classification system aligns closely with the clinical characteristics of Hoffa fracture, facilitates the differentiation of various fracture types, and recommends appropriate surgical approaches and fixation methods. This classification method also presents good inter- and intra-observer reliability and can be used in clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.