ArticleJournal of neuromuscular diseases2025
Clinical validity of congenital myopathy genes determined by the ClinGen Congenital Myopathies Expert Panel.
Article in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Landscape and Diagnostic Outcomes of UK Patients With Congenital Myopathies and Muscular Dystrophies Over a 10-Year Period.Neurology. Genetics · 2026Article
- Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Clinical, Molecular, and Histopathologic Characteristics of 275 Patients With Nemaline Myopathy.Neurology. Genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCongenital myopathies are a group of neuromuscular disorders that typically present at birth or early childhood with hypotonia and non-progressive or slowly progressive muscle weakness. They are classically subclassified by characteristic structural changes and histopathological findings in skeletal muscle. Variants in over 40 genes have been described to date in patients with various forms of congenital myopathy with overlapping phenotypic and histological features, which poses a challenge for laboratories and clinicians in interpreting genetic findings.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the evidence supporting each gene-disease relationship and provide an expert-reviewed classification for the clinical validity of genes involved in congenital myopathies.
methodsThe ClinGen Neurological Disorders Clinical Domain Working Group assembled the Congenital Myopathies Gene Curation Expert Panel (CongenMyopathy-GCEP), a group of clinicians and geneticists with expertise in congenital myopathies tasked to perform evidence-based curation of 50 gene-disease relationships using the ClinGen semiquantitative framework to assign clinical validity.
resultsOur curation effort resulted in 35 (70%) Definitive, eight (16%) Moderate, six (12%) Limited, and one (2%) Disputed disease relationship classifications. The summary of each curation is made publicly available on the ClinGen website.
conclusionsExpert-reviewed assignment of gene-disease relationships by the CongenMyopathy-GCEP facilitates accurate molecular diagnoses for congenital myopathies and can allow genetic testing to focus on genes with a validated role in disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.