ArticleAnnals of botany2025
Nuances of floral mimicry in Queen of Sheba orchids.
Article in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Colors for Resources: Reward-Linked Visual Displays in Orchids.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- DeceptiveFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsFloral deception can range from finely tuned mimicry of specific rewarding plants (Batesian mimicry) to a general resemblance of the rewarding community (generalized food deception). We focused on two species in the deceptive Thelymitra variegata complex (Queen of Sheba orchids) to examine whether pollination is consistent with generalized food deception or with specific mimicry of co-flowering buzz-pollinated tinsel lilies (Calectasia spp.).
methodsWe assessed (1) overlap in flower colour and scent between orchids, tinsel lilies and other flowers in the rewarding community and (2) pollinator sharing between orchids, tinsel lilies and other species, and (3) quantified orchid reproductive success in relation to abundance of tinsel lilies and other rewarding species. KEY
resultsWe found that Thelymitra speciosa matches the flower colour and scent of its co-flowering tinsel lily, Calectasia gracilis, while Thelymitra porphyrosticta partly overlaps with co-flowering Calectasia demarzii in both traits. The orchids and tinsel lilies shared flower visitors, and the only visitor observed to transfer orchid pollen was the bee Anthoglossa plumata (Colletidae), which displayed a behaviour associated with buzz-pollination. This species was also observed to buzz-pollinate tinsel lilies. In T. speciosa, fruit production increased with abundance of both tinsel lilies and other rewarding species with similar flower colour, suggesting a combination of mimicry and magnet effects. However, relationships were driven by a single population. There was no association between rewarding community and reproductive success in T. porphyrosticta.
conclusionsThe results are partly consistent with mimicry towards the co-flowering tinsel lily for both orchids. Specific mimicry is strongly supported by a close resemblance involving multiple floral traits, and by bee behaviour associated with the buzz-pollinated model. However, this contrasts with the lack of consistent effects of tinsel lily abundance on orchid reproductive success. The findings further suggest that shared floral scent may reinforce visual similarity and highlight that scent may be important in food mimicry systems. Overall, the T. variegata complex offers an interesting system for studying the evolution of mimicry, in particular regarding the contribution of visual and olfactory signals in food mimicry systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.