Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40490962›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025

HPV vaccination coverage, hesitancy, and barriers: Insights from a serial cross-sectional study in Shanghai, China (2019-2024).

Mengdi Ji, Zhuoying Huang, Han Yan, Jia Ren, Abram L Wagner, Xiaodong Sun, Matthew L Boulton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mengdi JiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Zhuoying HuangDepartment of Immunization Program, Shanghai Municipal Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Shanghai, China.
Han YanDepartment of Immunization Program, Shanghai Municipal Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Shanghai, China.
Jia RenDepartment of Immunization Program, Shanghai Municipal Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Shanghai, China.
Abram L WagnerDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Xiaodong SunDepartment of Immunization Program, Shanghai Municipal Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Shanghai, China.
Matthew L BoultonDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

Characterizing parental beliefs to support optimization of vaccine introductionK01AI137123 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WAGNER, ABRAM LUTHER · 2019 to 2023
$475k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI137123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women globally and a significant public health challenge in China, which accounts for nearly 18% of global cervical cancer cases. The HPV vaccine is a proven intervention for preventing high-risk HPV infections and associated cancers. This serial cross-sectional study conducted in Shanghai, China, in 2019 and 2024 analyzed changes in HPV vaccination rates and vaccine hesitancy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the associations between HPV vaccination, general vaccine hesitancy, and HPV-specific vaccine hesitancy, adjusting for sociodemographic factors. The Population Attributable Fraction (PAF) quantified the proportion of non-vaccination attributable to these factors. In 2019 and 2024, two waves of data were collected from 1,037 and 1,450 parents, respectively. Results showed an increase in HPV vaccination from 6% to 30% during the study period, primarily among women aged 18 and older, while coverage among the WHO target group (girls aged 9-14) remained low at 8%. Parents with HPV-specific vaccine hesitancy were 75% less likely to vaccinate their daughters (OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.11-0.56), while general vaccine hesitancy reduced vaccination likelihood by 94% (OR = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.00-0.89). PAF analysis indicated that HPV-specific vaccine hesitancy contributed to 24% of non-vaccination cases, higher than general vaccine hesitancy (10%). These findings highlight the critical need for targeted interventions addressing HPV-specific barriers, improving education about vaccination timing and options, and reducing logistical obstacles to align with global cervical cancer elimination goals.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaccinationVaccination CoverageVaccination HesitancyAdolescentAdultChildChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParentsPapillomavirus Vaccinescervical cancer preventionChina public healthHPV vaccinePopulation Attributable Fraction (PAF)vaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID40490962
PMCPMC12153397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.