Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40490838›Full record

ReviewBiological research2025

Plant long noncoding RNAs: why do we not know more?

Paulina Kościelniak, Łukasz Walas, Agata Konecka, Włodzimierz Buraczyk, Ewelina A Klupczyńska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paulina Kościelniak *Institute of Human Biology and Evolution, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego 6, 61614, Poznań, Poland.
Łukasz Walas *Institute of Dendrology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Parkowa 5, 62030, Kórnik, Poland.
Agata KoneckaWarsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 166, 02787, Warsaw, Poland.
Włodzimierz BuraczykWarsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 166, 02787, Warsaw, Poland.
Ewelina A KlupczyńskaInstitute of Human Biology and Evolution, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Uniwersytetu Poznańskiego 6, 61614, Poznań, Poland. ewelina.marte@amu.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5931-6569

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analysis of plant and animal genomes is essential for understanding their biological function, adaptation, and evolution. Human genomic databases are the most advanced due to extensive research on the genetic basis of disease and personalized medicine. Key resources include GenBank, Ensembl, the 1000 Genomes Project, and GTEx, which provide detailed information on genome sequences, genetic variation, and gene expression in different tissues. Similarly, genomic and transcriptome databases for animals are relatively well-developed, particularly for model organisms such as Mus musculus, Drosophila melanogaster, and Danio rerio. In contrast, plant genomic databases are developing rapidly but remain less comprehensive than those for humans and animals. This discrepancy is primarily due to the high species diversity and complexity of plant genomes, which are often characterized by gene duplication and significant structural variability. Databases such as Phytozome, TAIR (The Arabidopsis Information Resource), Gramene, and Planteome focus mainly on model plants and agriculturally important species. Another crucial factor is the lower funding for plant-related projects, despite the substantial investment required due to the large size and complexity of plant genomes. This disparity is also evident in the study of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), which play a key role in the growth and development of organisms. In plants, genome complexity-driven by factors such as considerable length, polyploidy, and epigenetic modifications-poses significant challenges for research. Despite these obstacles, understanding lncRNAs in plants, particularly in forest trees, is of paramount importance. lncRNAs hold great potential for applications in agriculture and forestry, especially in the context of climate change. For example, they could enhance our ability to develop resilient tree species capable of withstanding environmental stressors. To achieve this, a comprehensive understanding of lncRNA functions at the molecular and biological levels, as well as the development of robust and complete databases, is urgently needed. In the near future, computational analyses are expected to play a key role in overcoming these challenges. In this article, we review the current state of knowledge about lncRNAs in plants, highlight the obstacles to their study, and explore how advances in this field could revolutionize agriculture and forestry. By focusing on the unique challenges and opportunities presented by forest trees, we emphasize the crucial role of lncRNA research in addressing global environmental challenges.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantPlantsRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, PlantAnimalsDatabases, GeneticHumansRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, PlantCoexpressionComputational analysesEpitranscriptomeGenome duplicationGenome sizelncRNAmiRNAPlantsPolyploidizationSpecies range

Identifiers

PMID40490838
PMCPMC12150486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.