ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Adolescent scoliosis in autism spectrum disorder: is it idiopathic or syndromic??
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMinimal data exists on whether adolescents with both autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and scoliosis exhibit distinct curve types or require varying surgical management compared to neurotypical adolescents. Our study at a high-volume scoliosis center compares patterns of scoliosis in ASD patients with those of neurotypical patients. We hypothesized adolescents with ASD would present with atypical scoliosis curve characteristics compared to neurotypical adolescents.
methodsUsing ICD-10 codes, we constructed an electronic database of adolescents aged 10 to 18 with diagnoses of both scoliosis and ASD. To avoid confounding with syndromic conditions, adolescents with a syndrome independently associated with scoliosis were excluded. Additionally, a 1:2 matched cohort analysis was performed to compare adolescents with ASD and scoliosis (ASD-S) to neurotypical individuals diagnosed with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
resultsIn our study, we describe demographics, radiographic characteristics, and complications experienced by 37 patients with both scoliosis and ASD. Almost half of ASD-S patients (18/37 patients; 48.6%) exhibited sagittal plane abnormalities. In comparison to the matched cohort of neurotypical patients, ASD-S patients had increased T5-12 thoracic kyphosis (31.6 vs. 24.4 degrees, p = 0.005), maximum thoracic kyphosis (36.8 vs. 30.9 degrees, p = 0.040) and lumbar lordosis (50.9 vs. 46.1 degrees, p = 0.043). Sagittal vertical axis ≥ 5 cm was more prevalent in ASD-S patients than patients with AIS (p = 0.015). Furthermore, ASD-S patients were more likely to demonstrate an abnormal trunk shift (46% versus 19%) compared to the neurotypical cohort. Social and behavioral barriers prevented three ASD-S patients (8%) and no patients with AIS who were indicated for posterior spinal fusion from undergoing the procedure.
conclusionASD-S patients had increased thoracic kyphosis compared to both controls and published AIS norms, suggesting scoliosis in ASD could potentially be considered a form of syndromic scoliosis rather than truly idiopathic. Additionally, the impact of social and behavioral barriers must be considered when treating this patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.