ArticleParasites & vectors2025
In vitro interaction profiles and midgut glycoconjugates of Trichophoromyia spp./Leishmania (Viannia) lainsoni.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Revisiting Leishmania (Viannia) lainsoni Silveira, Shaw, Braga, and Ishikawa, 1987: current knowledge and emerging perspectives.Parasites & vectors · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundKnowledge of sand fly-Leishmania attachment determinants is pivotal for providing evidence on vector status. Considering the Amazonian transmission context of Trichophoromyia spp.-L. (Viannia) lainsoni, the present study aimed to assess in vitro interactions and detect gut glycoconjugates associated with this vector-parasite association.
methodsField-caught Trichophoromyia brachipyga and Trichophoromyia ubiquitalis were tested. Lutzomyia longipalpis reared in the laboratory was used as a control. The intestines were obtained by dissection, and the species were confirmed by morphology. Interactions for each sand fly-Leishmania association were individually performed via an in vitro incubation system. N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc), galactose-(β 1,3)-GalNAc (Gal/GalNAc), and N-acetyl-D-galactosamine (GalNAc) glycoconjugates of Trichophoromyia spp. were analyzed by Western blotting using corresponding peroxidase-conjugated lectins.
resultsNo difference was found between Th. ubiquitalis and Lu. longipalpis attachment with L. (V.) lainsoni, and Lu. longipalpis with Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum (control). However, Th. brachipyga-L. (V.) lainsoni attachment was weaker than that of the control. Trichophoromyia spp. were negative for residues of GlcNAc terminally exposed. Trichophoromyia ubiquitalis was positive for GalNAc and Gal/GalNAc, whereas Th. brachipyga presented only residues of GalNac terminally exposed.
conclusionsThe present study suggests that Trichophoromyia spp. sand flies, particularly Th. brachipyga, are susceptible to L. (V.) lainsoni, based on the observed vector-parasite attachment profiles and detection of GalNAc in their midguts. This supports early field data suggesting the vector status of these sand fly species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.