Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40490727›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2025

Brief multidimensional screening tools for young children's mental health and development for administration by primary care providers: a scoping review.

Ashley D Radomski, Christine Polihronis, Paula Cloutier, Kayla Beaudin, Mario Cappelli

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ashley D RadomskiKnowledge Institute on Child and Youth Mental Health and Addictions, Ottawa, ON, Canada. aradomski@cheo.on.ca.
Christine PolihronisKnowledge Institute on Child and Youth Mental Health and Addictions, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Paula CloutierCHEO (Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario) Research Institute, 401 Smyth Road, K1H 8L1, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Kayla BeaudinKnowledge Institute on Child and Youth Mental Health and Addictions, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Mario CappelliKnowledge Institute on Child and Youth Mental Health and Addictions, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 423271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany young children with mental health or developmental concerns go unidentified and untreated, underscoring the need for effective screening. Primary care offers unique opportunities for screening, yet rates are low. Primary care providers often cite time constraints, insufficient training, and costs as barriers to screening. Tools designed for administration by primary care providers hold promise for facilitating personalized assessments and improving communication, collaboration, and follow-up between providers and families. To improve early identification and intervention, it is crucial to understand provider-administered screening tools that align with their practical constraints.

aimTo identify and describe the characteristics, limitations, and improvement areas of brief, multidimensional screening for young children's mental health and development, designed for administration by primary care providers.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review according to published guidelines. We searched seven electronic databases and used hand-searching strategies. We sought English-language publications on screening tools (English or French) assessing at least one mental health and one development domain in children up to 6 years, designed for administration by primary care providers in under 20 minutes. Two reviewers assessed the articles' eligibility and then extracted, charted, and summarized relevant data.

resultsThree screening tools from six articles were included. The tools were primarily administered by physicians or nurses to children aged 2 weeks to 4 years and required minimal training to use. The tools varied in their domains (4-6), items (10-110), psychometric properties, and scoring methods, but all included indicators of delayed or at-risk children. Article limitations included study recency and lack of data related to implementation and patient outcomes.

conclusionsThis review described the development and evaluation of multidimensional screening tools for young children's mental health and development designed for administration by primary care providers. It found that few tools have been published. This review identifies several knowledge gaps and emphasizes the need for research on the implementation, cost-effectiveness, and comparative performance of screening tools, as well as the development and evaluation of new screening tools that suit providers' needs. Future studies should investigate how these screening tools can improve identification, clinical care, and health outcomes.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningMental DisordersPrimary Health CareChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantMental HealthAssessmentChildChild developmentHealth care providersInfant screeningMental healthPediatricsPrimary careReviewScreening tool

Identifiers

PMID40490727
PMCPMC12147285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.