Trial reportBMC oral health2025
Effect of silver diamine fluoride and nanosilver on salivary bacterial counts in children with early childhood caries: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05221749 (The Antibacterial Effect of Nanosilver Fluoride in Relation to Caries Activity in Primary Teeth), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Antibacterial Effect of Nanosilver Fluoride in Relation to Caries Activity in Primary Teeth: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSilver diamine fluoride (SDF) is indicated for the management of early childhood caries (ECC). Similarly, nanosilver fluoride (NSF) is effective against caries. However, there are limited comparisons between both agents, especially regarding their antibacterial effect. This randomized controlled clinical trial aimed to compare the effects of SDF and NSF on salivary bacterial counts in children with ECC.
methodsFifty 4-6-year-olds presenting with active dentin caries (ICDAS code 5) in primary teeth were randomly allocated to two groups. Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Lactobacilli in unstimulated saliva were cultivated on differential media and counted as colony-forming units. Followed by the application of either 38% SDF or NSF. Saliva samples were recollected after one month. The legal guardians completed a detailed questionnaire assessing their child's dental hygiene habits, dental pain experience, and socioeconomic background. Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to assess the effects of both agents on bacterial counts while accounting for confounders.
resultsThe mean age of participants was 4.8 ± 0.8 years, with the majority (96%, N = 48) presenting with severe ECC. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding age, sex, dmft score, socioeconomic background, dental hygiene habits, or dental experience. After one month, within-group analysis showed a significant reduction in S. mutans only in the NSF group (p = 0.002) and significant decreases in Lactobacilli counts in both SDF and NSF groups (p < 0.05). However, between-group comparisons revealed no significant differences in the reduction of S. mutans (1.4% and 6.0%, respectively, p = 0.192) or Lactobacilli counts (6.0% and 6.0%, respectively, p = 0.754). Regression analyses revealed non-significant odds of reduced bacterial counts after NSF application compared to SDF.
conclusionAfter one application, children with ECC showed significant decrease in salivary bacteria, with no difference between the two agents regarding their antibacterial effect. NSF can serve as a viable option in ECC management in that it provides comparable antibacterial effects to 38% SDF without inducing tooth discoloration. This trial was prospectively registered on the clinicaltrials.gov registry with ID: NCT05221749 on 03/02/2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.