ArticleBMC medical research methodology2025
VAS value set still has its own application value compare with TTO value set of EQ-5D-3L in Chinese population.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correction: VAS value set still has its own application value compare with TTO value set of EQ-5D-3L in Chinese population.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Enhancing outcomes in type 2 diabetes: the role of psychological interventions within multidisciplinary rehabilitation care.BMC nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a Chinese visual analogue scale (VAS) value set for Europe Quality of Life Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) and compare it with the time trade-off (TTO) value set which was constructed based on the same sample.
methodsAn adapted Measurement and Valuation of Health (MVH) protocol was applied with VAS method. EQ-5D-3L was used in face-to-face interviews conducted by trained interviewers with participants selected via multi-stage stratified clustered random sample. Fifteen hypothetical health statuses (11 random states in MVH protocol, plus full health, severe problems for all dimensions, unconscious, and death) were assigned for assessment individually. Ordinary least square (OLS), general least square (GLS), and weighted least square (WLS) models were constructed. Five categories of indices, including quality of original data, distribution of rescaled values, goodness of fit of models, distribution of predicted values, and dimensions order were adopted to compare between Chinese VAS and TTO value sets.
resultsAll 5,939 participants aged 15 and over were completely interviewed; 5,884 eligible participants were included in constructing models. Model 2 was the best for having 4 out of 7 indices of goodness of fit. Comparing with the TTO value set, Adjusted R-square of Model2 increased from 0.354 to 0.670;the mean absolute error decreased from 0.0838 to 0.0319; and the Pearson correlation coefficient between predicted and mean values increased from0.8989 to 0.9837. Model 2 gave uniformly lower values than Chinese TTO value set. VAS method had a higher responsive rate, less inconsistency, lower skewed values, and better goodness of fit values.
conclusionsWe recommend VAS value set, Model 2, as the reference of scoring algorithm when using EQ-5D-3L in large scale survey of Chinese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.