Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40490695›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Decision makers' perceptions on implementing welfare technology in Swedish municipal elder care: a qualitative study.

Johannes Österholm, Vedrana Baric, Ingrid Hellström, Katarina Baudin, Åsa Larsson Ranada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johannes ÖsterholmDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine (PRNV), Unit of occupational therapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. johannes.h.osterholm@liu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6241-0027
Vedrana BaricDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine (PRNV), Unit of occupational therapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1795-7530
Ingrid HellströmDepartment of Health Care Sciences, Marie Cederschiöld University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8007-1770
Katarina BaudinDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1593-4220
Åsa Larsson RanadaDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine (PRNV), Unit of occupational therapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0761-1942

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWelfare technology is often depicted as a potential solution for managing the increasing challenges on elder care services, which is expected to rise due to demographic changes. In this study, we explore local decision-makers' perceptions on implementing welfare technologies in Swedish municipal elder care.

methodsFour politicians and twelve local government officials were interviewed, and reflexive thematic analysis was utilized.

resultsOur findings suggest that welfare technology is portrayed as a sustainable long-term solution, governed by bureaucratic structures. Successful implementation requires shared responsibility among various stakeholders but also moving in-between resistance and acceptance among staff and older people. Furthermore, welfare technology was viewed to reduce staff burdens and increase independence and participation for older people.

conclusionsWelfare technology is viewed positively by local decision-makers as a long-term solution to challenges associated with funding and staff shortages in elder care. It is expected to reduce the burden on staff and increase independence and participation for older people. However, bureaucratic challenges must be addressed to enhance the quality of elder care.

Indexed as

Administrative PersonnelDecision MakingHealth Services for the AgedLocal GovernmentPerceptionQualitative ResearchSocial WelfareAgedFemaleHumansMaleSwedenDigital solutionsE-healthGerontechnologyOlder personSelf-help equipment

Identifiers

PMID40490695
PMCPMC12150517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.