ArticleJournal of evidence-based medicine2025
IDEAL-Acu: A Methodological Framework for Evaluating the Effects of Acupuncture.
Article in Journal of evidence-based medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Global research trends and insights in acupuncture randomized controlled trials: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Complex Intervention Frameworks for Acupuncture: Recommendations from a Scoping Review.Chinese journal of integrative medicine · 2026Article
- Acupuncture for Post-Stroke Lower Limb Dysfunction: Clinical Efficacy and Neurophysiological Mechanisms.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe demand for high-quality clinical evidence supporting acupuncture remains urgent, necessitating the establishment of a suitable methodological framework to promote its generation.
methodsFollowing internal deliberations and extensive online discussions with experts in the IDEAL Collaboration, we proposed the IDEAL-Acu framework specifically for acupuncture, based on the surgery-focused IDEAL model with necessary modifications to accommodate the characteristics of acupuncture. To ensure consensus on recommendations, a panel of external experts and internal research team members was convened, and any disagreements were iteratively resolved through expert review.
resultsThis article introduces an IDEAL-Acu framework with five stages for evaluating acupuncture outcome and improving practice to optimize treatment. The framework includes Idea (proposal of an acupuncture regime), Development (optimization or standardization of the acupuncture regime), Exploration (feasibility assessment for conducting a definitive RCT), Assessment (evaluation of effects through comparison with standard therapy or sham acupuncture), and Long-term monitoring (examination of long-term efficacy and safety) stages. We provide clear recommendations for each stage along with specific examples.
conclusionThe framework highlights the importance of conducting studies at each stage in acupuncture evaluation process and can serve as a helpful guide for assessing its effects and promoting evidence-based practice in acupuncture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.