ArticleEndocrine2025
Surgical decision in patients with primary aldosteronism based on adrenal veins aldosterone not corrected by cortisol.
Article in Endocrine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCortisol-corrected aldosterone concentration is used to interpret adrenal venous sampling (AVS) results to identify the subtype of primary aldosteronism. Whether AVS could be interpreted using aldosterone without cortisol correction is unclear. PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) and aldosterone ratio (PAC of the higher side divided by PAC of the lower side) of the adrenal veins for the diagnosis of unilateral PA (UPA).
methodsA retrospective study was conducted in PA patients who underwent bilaterally successful AVS. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), specificity and sensitivity of PAC and aldosterone ratio of adrenal veins in non-stimulated and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) - stimulated AVS were calculated.
results323 patients with UPA and 122 with bilateral PA were included. Under non-ACTH stimulated AVS, AUC of PAC and aldosterone ratio to diagnose UPA were 0.86 (95%CI 0.83-0.89) and 0.84 (95%CI 0.80-0.88), respectively. The specificity was 90%, with sensitivity of 59%, when using PAC cutoff of 1012.8 ng/dL to diagnose UPA. The specificity was 90%, with sensitivity of 65%, when using aldosterone ratio cutoff of 6.84 to diagnose UPA. Under ACTH stimulated AVS, PAC and aldosterone ratio showed similar accuracy to diagnose UPA. The specificity was 90%, with sensitivity of 60%, when using PAC cutoff of 4008.3 ng/dL to diagnose UPA. The specificity was 90%, with sensitivity of 80%, when using aldosterone ratio cutoff of 4.77 to diagnose UPA.
conclusionPAC and aldosterone ratio of the adrenal veins can be used to diagnose UPA during non-stimulated and ACTH-stimulated AVS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40490669What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.