Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40490667›Full record

ArticleJournal of gambling studies2025

Electronic Gaming Machine Consumers' Understanding of Past & Future Spending: Associations with Risk, Impulsivity, Self-Control, & Problematic Gambling.

Teejay Santos, Robert M Heirene, Deborah Cobb-Clark, Agnieszka Tymula, Sally M Gainsbury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gambling studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Teejay SantosBrain & Mind Centre, School of Psychology, Science Faculty, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8546-0905
Robert M HeireneBrain & Mind Centre, School of Psychology, Science Faculty, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5508-7102
Deborah Cobb-ClarkARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families Over the Life Course, School of Economics, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2895-7886
Agnieszka TymulaARC Centre of Excellence for Children and Families Over the Life Course, School of Economics, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0521-8477
Sally M GainsburyBrain & Mind Centre, School of Psychology, Science Faculty, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. sally.gainsbury@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9641-5838

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An individual's ability to make informed decisions about future gambling expenditure requires an awareness of affordability and likely return, and hence an accurate understanding of their past outcomes. Electronic gaming machines (EGMs) have been criticised for having structural characteristics that erode informed decision-making (e.g., loses disguised as wins, display of credits vs. currency). Here we investigate individual's understanding of their recent and future  EGM spending. Survey responses for 187 Australian EGM customers (age range:18-81, 57% female) were linked to their account data held by a gambling venue. Few customers accurately recalled and predicted their past/future 30-day expenditure to within a 10% margin of error, including net outcome (i.e., accurate recall [5.5%] or prediction [17.4%] of total amount won or lost); win (10.5%; 32.9%), and total spend (2.6%; 12.8%). The ability to accurately report gambling expenditure was almost exclusively limited to those who did not gamble during the period reported. Participants with greater impulsivity and more willingness to take risks were less accurate in their prediction of net outcome and spend, respectively. Across recall and prediction, participants commonly overestimated their net result, yet underestimated the amount they won, suggesting that winnings are re-gambled without considering them as their own funds. Our findings demonstrate EGM customers do not understand their gambling expenditure and changes are needed to the product and environment to facilitate informed choice.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveGamblingSelf-ControlVideo GamesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaDecision MakingFemaleHumansImpulsive BehaviorMaleMiddle AgedRisk-TakingDecision-makingGambling disorderImpulsivityProblem gamblingRisky behaviourSelf-control

Identifiers

PMID40490667
PMCPMC12657582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.