Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40490658›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

A comprehensive study of template-based frequency detection methods in SSVEP-based brain-computer interfaces.

Mohammad Norizadeh Cherloo, Homa Kashefi Amiri, Amir Mohammad Mijani, Liang Zhan, Mohammad Reza Daliri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mohammad Norizadeh CherlooBiomedical Engineering Department, School of Electrical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Narmak, Tehran, 16846-13114, Iran.
Homa Kashefi AmiriArtificial Intelligence Department, School of Computer Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Narmak, Tehran, 16846-13114, Iran.
Amir Mohammad MijaniDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, 3700 O'Hara St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Liang ZhanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, 3700 O'Hara St., Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA.
Mohammad Reza DaliriBiomedical Engineering Department, School of Electrical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Narmak, Tehran, 16846-13114, Iran. daliri@iust.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, SSVEP-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have received increasing attention from researchers due to their high signal-to-noise ratios (SNR), high information transfer rates (ITR), and low user training. Therefore, various methods have been proposed to recognize the frequency of SSVEPs. This paper reviewed the state-of-the-art frequency detection methods in SSVEP-based BCIs. Nineteen multi-channel SSVEP detection methods, organized into four categories based on different analytical approaches, were studied. All methods are template-based approaches and classified into four groups according to the basic models they employ: canonical correlation analysis (CCA), multivariate synchronization index (MSI), task-related component analysis (TRCA), and correlated component analysis (CORRCA). Each group consists of methods that use one of these basic models as the core model for their approach. This paper provides a description, a clear flowchart, and MATLAB code for each method and helps researchers use or develop the existing SSVEP detection methods. Although all methods were evaluated in separate studies, a comprehensive comparison of methods is still missing. In this study, several experiments were conducted to assess the performance of SSVEP detection methods. The benchmark 40-class SSVEP dataset from 35 subjects was used to evaluate methods. All methods were applied to the dataset and were evaluated in terms of classification accuracy, information transfer rate (ITR), and computational time. The experiment results revealed that four factors efficiently design an accurate, robust SSVEP detection method. (1) employing filter bank analysis to incorporate fundamental and harmonics frequency components, (2) utilizing calibration data to construct optimized reference signals, (3) integrating spatial filters of all stimuli to construct classification features, and (4) calculating spatial filters using training trials. Furthermore, results showed that filter bank ensemble task-related components (FBETRCA) achieved the highest performance.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHumansSignal-To-Noise RatioBrain–computer interfacesCCA-based methodsCORRCA-based methodsElectroencephalographyMSI-based methodsMulti-channel SSVEP detection methodsSteady-state visually evoked potentialTemplate-based SSVEP detection methodsTRCA-based methods

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.