Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40490652›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2026

Long-term costs associated with healthcare use of people with cancer in Scotland.

Kenny Haining, Elizabeth Lemmon, Peter Hall, Nazir I Lone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kenny HainingThe Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Usher Building, 5-7 Little France Road, Edinburgh BioQuarter - Gate 3, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, Scotland. khaining.research@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-1682-5105
Elizabeth LemmonThe Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Usher Building, 5-7 Little France Road, Edinburgh BioQuarter - Gate 3, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, Scotland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3564-6106
Peter HallThe Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Usher Building, 5-7 Little France Road, Edinburgh BioQuarter - Gate 3, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, Scotland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6015-7841
Nazir I LoneThe Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Usher Building, 5-7 Little France Road, Edinburgh BioQuarter - Gate 3, Edinburgh, EH16 4UX, Scotland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2707-2779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence for the long-term costs of cancer is limited, particularly in the Scottish population. Our aim was to better understand the long-term healthcare use and associated costs of cancer in Scotland, and their relationship with cancer survival.

methodsThis was a retrospective study using routine healthcare data to measure inpatient, outpatient, community prescription use and their costs from a national health service perspective. Per-episode incidence costs were assigned using reference costs and charted over eight years during the period 2009 to 2018 by year and phase of care. Risk factors for survival and costs were analysed using Cox regression and generalised linear model regression.

resultsIn total, 55,807 adults with cancer were followed over eight years after their diagnosis. Trajectories indicated a complex relationship with survival. Mean cumulative per-patient costs for all cancers were £29,460 at 2017/18 price levels (95% CI £29,199 to £29,720). Considerable variation was observed between cancer types with the highest costs in non-Hodgkin lymphoma at £47,672 (95%CI £45,500 to £49,843) and the lowest in malignant melanoma of skin at £19,217, (95%CI £18,251 to £20,184). Variables negatively associated with costs tended to be positively associated with hazard of death. Only screening was significantly associated with both lower costs (adjusted cost ratio 0.85, p < 0.001) and lower hazard of death (adjusted hazard ratio 0.30, p < 0.001).

conclusionsSubstantial costs were observed in all cancer types studied, with the highest costs measured in the year following diagnosis. Screening was associated with both lower costs and better survival, supporting the focus on early detection.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsNeoplasmsPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsScotlandState MedicineYoung AdultCancerCostsEconomicsHealthcare costsHealthcare usePredictors

Identifiers

PMID40490652
PMCPMC12929287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.