Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40490601›Full record

ArticleEMBO reports2025

Regulated microexon alternative splicing in single neurons tunes synaptic function.

Bikash Choudhary, Rebekah Napier-Jameson, Adam Norris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EMBO reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bikash ChoudharyDepartment of Biochemistry, University of California, Riverside, 3401 Watkins Drive, Boyce Hall, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Rebekah Napier-JamesonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX, 75205, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8588-0702
Adam NorrisDepartment of Biochemistry, University of California, Riverside, 3401 Watkins Drive, Boyce Hall, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA. adamn@ucr.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0570-7414

Funding

Dissecting RNA regulation in single cells and tissuesR35GM133461 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI Adam Norris · 2019 to 2026
$3.1M
COORDINATE CONTROL OF INDIVIDUAL NEURONAL TRANSCRIPTOMES BY TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS AND RNA BINDING PROTEINSR01NS111055 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI NORRIS, ADAM · 2020 to 2024
$1.6M
HHS | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) R35GM133461HHS | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) R01NS111055NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133461NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS111055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microexons are important components of the neuronal transcriptome. Though tiny, their splicing is essential for neuronal development and function. Microexons are typically included in the nervous system and skipped in other tissues, but less is known about whether they are alternatively spliced across neuron types, and if so what the regulatory mechanisms and functional consequences might be. We set out to globally address this question in C. elegans using deep single-cell transcriptomes and in vivo splicing reporters. We find widespread alternative microexon splicing across neuron types. Focusing on a broadly-conserved 9-nucleotide exon in the synaptic vesicle gene unc-13, we find that it is completely skipped in olfactory neurons, but completely included in motor neurons. This splicing pattern is established by two neuronal RNA binding proteins which recruit spliceosomal component PRP-40 to mediate microexon inclusion. Cell-specific microexon alternative splicing is functionally important, as forcing microexon inclusion causes olfactory defects, while forcing microexon skipping causes locomotory defects. These locomotory defects are caused by decreased inhibitory motor neuron synaptic transmission and altered synaptic vesicle distribution. Regulatory features of unc-13 microexon splicing are broadly conserved: related MUN-domain genes in worms, flies, and mice invariably encode microexons, and those we tested are subject to similar regulatory principles (e.g. included in motor neurons, skipped in olfactory neurons, and regulated by the same two RNA binding proteins). Thus, not only is microexon inclusion important for nervous system function, but microexon alternative splicing across neurons is important for tuning neuronal function in individual cell types.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingExonsNeuronsSynapsesAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsMotor NeuronsRNA-Binding ProteinsSingle-Cell AnalysisSynaptic TransmissionSynaptic VesiclesTranscriptomeCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsAlternative SplicingMicroexonNeuronSplicingunc-13

Identifiers

PMID40490601
PMCPMC12287369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.