Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40490593›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

How low can you go? Tracking eye movements during reading at different sampling rates.

Bernhard Angele, Zeynep Gunes Ozkan, Marina Serrano-Carot, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bernhard AngeleCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, Calle de Asura, 90, 28043, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8989-8555
Zeynep Gunes OzkanERI-Lectura and Department of Methodology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitat de Valéncia, Av. de Blasco Ibáñez, 21, 46010, Valencia, Spain. zeynep.ozkan@uv.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8684-5789
Marina Serrano-CarotCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, Calle de Asura, 90, 28043, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9706-2413
Jon Andoni DuñabeitiaCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, Calle de Asura, 90, 28043, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3312-8559

Funding

Comunidad de Madrid 2022-T1/SOC-23980Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología PID2021-126884NB-I00 (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/5011000110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye-movement research has revolutionized our understanding of reading, but the use of eye-tracking techniques in investigating the reading process is still limited by the cost of high-precision eye-tracking, which limits research to laboratories with sufficient resources. It is important to evaluate to what extent cognitive processes during reading can be measured with less expensive eye-tracking devices. One such way may be to use devices with a lower sampling rate, which are much less expensive than high-sampling rate eye-trackers. We recorded readers' eye movements during reading at different sampling rates and show that it is possible to measure the classic effect of word frequency on fixation duration, reflecting ongoing cognitive processing during reading, at sampling rates ranging from 250 to 2000 Hz. We simulate even lower sampling rates and show that, with a sufficiently large sample size, it is possible to detect the effect of word frequency even at very low sampling rates (30-125 Hz). Our results demonstrate that, in principle, low sampling rates are not an obstacle to studying the effects of cognitive processing during reading.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsEye-Tracking TechnologyReadingAdultFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMaleEye movementsReadingSampling rateWord count

Identifiers

PMID40490593
PMCPMC12149270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.