ArticleScientific data2025
Comparable 2022 General Election Advertising Datasets from Meta and Google.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper introduces two comprehensive datasets containing information on digital ads in U.S. federal elections from Meta (including Facebook and Instagram) and Google (including YouTube) for the 2022 midterm general election period. We collected ads published on these platforms utilizing their ad transparency libraries and web scraping techniques and added labels to make them more comparable. The collected data underwent processing to extract audiovisual and textual information through automatic speech recognition (ASR), face recognition, and optical character recognition (OCR). Additionally, we performed several classification tasks to enhance the utility of the dataset. The resulting datasets encompass a rich array of features, including metadata, transcripts, and classifications. These datasets provide valuable resources for researchers, policymakers, and journalists to analyze the digital election advertising landscape, campaign strategies, and public engagement. By offering detailed and structured data, our work facilitates diverse reuse possibilities in fields such as political science, communication studies, and data science, enabling comprehensive analysis and insights into the dynamics of digital political campaigns.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.