Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40490472›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

CS-KG 2.0: A Large-scale Knowledge Graph of Computer Science.

Danilo Dessí, Francesco Osborne, Davide Buscaldi, Diego Reforgiato Recupero, Enrico Motta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danilo DessíDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computing and Informatics, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE.
Francesco OsborneThe Open University, Knowledge Media Institute, Milton Keynes, UK. francesco.osborne@open.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6557-3131
Davide BuscaldiSorbonne Paris Nord University, Laboratoire d'Informatique de Paris Nord, Paris, France.
Diego Reforgiato RecuperoUniversity of Cagliari, Mathematics and Computer Science Department, Cagliari, Italy.
Enrico MottaThe Open University, Knowledge Media Institute, Milton Keynes, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid evolution of AI and the increased accessibility of scientific articles through open access marks a pivotal moment in research. AI-driven tools are reshaping how scientists explore, interpret, and contribute to the body of scientific knowledge, offering unprecedented opportunities. Nonetheless, a significant challenge remains: dealing with the overwhelming number of papers published every year. A promising solution is the use of knowledge graphs, which provide structured, interconnected, and formalized frameworks that improve the capabilities of AI systems to integrate information from the literature. This paper presents the last version of the Computer Science Knowledge Graph (CS-KG 2.0), an extensive knowledge base generated from 15 million research papers. CS-KG 2.0 describes 25 million entities linked by 67 million relationships, offering a nuanced representation of the scientific knowledge within the field of computer science. This innovative resource facilitates new research opportunities in key areas such as analysis and forecasting of research trends, hypothesis generation, smart literature search, automatic production of literature review, and scientific question-answering.

Identifiers

PMID40490472
PMCPMC12149285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.