ArticleScientific reports2025
Ancient DNA integrates fossil and modern giant salamander taxonomy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The genus Andrias includes the largest extant salamanders, and is comprised of one Japanese species A. japonicus and four Chinese species. The fossil record of the giant salamander is incomplete and modern giant salamanders are not differentiated osteologically among species, making it difficult to identify bones at the species level. In this study, we re-examined a fossil series of giant salamander discovered from a cave on Shikoku Island, Japan. We obtained ancient DNA from the fossil and confirmed that the partial sequence of mitochondrial DNA was identical to that of extant A. japonicus. These remains were dated to the Late Pleistocene, however, the result of carbon-14 dating in this study estimated the age as more recent, approximately 3,500-4,100 years ago. Currently, there is a small population of A. japonicus in Shikoku, but it is far removed from the fossil discovery area. Our findings suggest that wild A. japonicus in western Shikoku may have been extirpated very recently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.