ArticleSpatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology2025
Integrating data at multiple spatial scales to estimate the local burden of the opioid syndemic.
Article in Spatial and spatio-temporal epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The opioid epidemic has been particularly severe in Ohio, prompting significant efforts to understand its spatial patterns, mainly using available data at the county level. However, relying solely on county-level analysis can overlook crucial information relevant to localized effects. To address this, we integrate spatially misaligned data observed at the county and ZIP code levels to explore the complex interaction of five opioid-related outcomes, providing a more detailed local understanding of the opioid epidemic. We demonstrate how to map ZIP-code level data to ZIP-code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) and relate the county-level and ZCTA-level outcomes to a spatially correlated latent factor. The latent factor is defined on the intersection of the misaligned areal units, which provides a more granular understanding of the opioid epidemic. Furthermore, this approach allows us to identify areas with varying levels of opioid burden and reveals local regions with relatively high burden that county-level analyses might miss. Finally, we highlight the need for careful consideration when relying solely on ZIP code level data for naloxone, as it may lead to misinterpretations, particularly in rural regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.