Trial reportAcademic pediatrics
Impact of Interventions to Improve Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Uptake on Other Vaccines Due: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.
Trial report in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing HPV vaccine hesitancy and misinformation in India through public health communication strategies.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Improving pharmacy-based HPV vaccine delivery through communication training: Findings from a pilot feasibility study.Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhAArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe sought to determine if our recent trial of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake improved influenza, meningococcal ACWY, and tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine uptake.
methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of our 4-year factorial stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial of 6 primary care practices affiliated with the Mayo Clinic. We restricted our analysis to those adolescents 11- to 12-years-old due for at least 1 of 3 vaccines in addition to HPV. Trial arms included 1) usual care, 2) mailed reminder-recall letters to parents of empaneled adolescents following their birthdays alerting parents to the need for HPV vaccination and other vaccines due, 3) monthly confidential audit-feedback reports to providers sent via intracampus mail comparing rates of HPV vaccination for that provider with others, and 4) both interventions. Outcomes included receipt of influenza, meningococcal ACWY, and Tdap vaccines during the study step.
resultsAmong trial participants, 8698 adolescents were due for ≥1 dose HPV and at least 1 of the other vaccines. The parent reminder-recall resulted in a clinically and statistically significant increase in uptake of the other vaccines (odds ratios ranging from 1.44-1.86, all 95% confidence intervals above 1.13) as it did in combination with the provider audit-feedback. Provider audit-feedback alone had no statistically significant impact.
conclusionsThe parent reminder-recall substantially improved uptake of all 3 vaccines, whereas the provider audit-feedback did not. This made sense as the reminder-recall treated all vaccines as equally recommended without a focus on the HPV vaccine due, while the audit-feedback only reported the provider's success with HPV vaccine uptake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.