ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2025
Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe investigated whether the shape of arterial blood input curves affects the diagnostic performance of myocardial blood flow (MBF) on rubidium-82 ( METHODS AND
resultsWe retrospectively enrolled 386 patients without prior CAD who underwent
resultsAmong the five abnormal categories, the AUC of stress MBF in the low SRPR group (n = 193) was lower than in the normal SRPR group (n = 193) in per-patient (.67 [.59-.74] vs. .78 [.70-.84], P = .0499, respectively) and per-vessel analyses (.68 [.63-0.73] vs. .75 [.71-.79], P = .0352, respectively). The AUC in slow activity rise group (n = 167) for stress MBF was lower than in others in per-vessel analysis (n = 219) (.68 [.62-.72] vs. .75 [.70-.79], P = .0270). Other abnormal profiles showed no significant differences (all P > .05).
conclusionsLow SRPR and slow activity rise were associated with reduced diagnostic performance of stress MBF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.