ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Patient-specific 3D reconstruction models for sacral tumor resection: illustrative cases.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of patient-specific 3D reconstruction models for en bloc resection of primary thoracic vertebral sarcomas without formal spondylectomy: illustrative cases.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Giant cervicothoracic malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor in neurofibromatosis type 1: a case report of multidisciplinary management and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Giant cervicothoracic malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor in neurofibromatosis type I: a case report of integrated management with multimodal guidance.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe surgical methods used to resect sacral tumors are extensive and require maneuvering through complex anatomical systems such as the pelvic organs and sacral nerve roots. These procedures may result in complications and adverse patient outcomes. The technology integrating 3D reconstruction models in the field of spine surgery is rapidly evolving, and these challenging cases present a unique opportunity to leverage this technology's capability for enhanced patient outcomes. OBSERVATIONS: The authors present two sacral tumor cases diagnosed with synovial cell sarcoma and giant cell osteosarcoma, respectively. Both patients underwent a three-staged en bloc tumor resection assisted by 3D reconstruction models. Postoperative imaging showed a complete tumor resection, and the patients symptomatically improved, with no signs of recurrence on follow-up. LESSONS: Surgical planning and execution have clearly advanced significantly with the introduction of 3D modeling into spine surgery. Based on the authors' experience, this technology can be used to improve outcomes for complicated spinal tumors with successful results. Although these results are encouraging, extensive studies with larger patient cohorts must be carried out to fully appreciate the technology's advantages across a range of patient demographics and tumor types. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE2522.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.