ArticleMedicine2025
The effect of circulating micronutrients on nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the causal relationships between circulating levels of 14 circulating micronutrients and the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. We conducted a 2-sample MR study using genome-wide association studies datasets. Data on 14 circulating micronutrients were obtained from UK Biobank datasets. The genome-wide association studies dataset of NPC (malignant neoplasm of nasopharynx) was downloaded from the FinnGen database. MR analyses were performed using the inverse variance weighted method, the MR-Egger method, and the weighted median method, with sensitivity analyses including MR-Egger, MR-PRESSO, and leave-one-out analyses to test for pleiotropy and heterogeneity. Using the inverse variance weighted method, MR univariate analysis showed that vitamin C, vitamin D, and zinc may have a causal relationship with the risk of NPC. Subsequently, MR multivariate analysis indicated that vitamin C (odds ratio: 1.55 × 1061, 95% confidence interval: 8.52 × 1011-2.81 × 10110, P = .015) and vitamin D (odds ratio: 8.62 × 10-10, 95% confidence interval: 1.73 × 10-17-0.043, P = .021) have a causal relationship with the risk of NPC. Sensitivity analyses confirmed no evidence of directional pleiotropy or significant heterogeneity, supporting the robustness of the findings. Our results provides evidence for causal relationships between circulating levels of vitamin C and vitamin D and the risk of NPC. Our findings underscore the importance of maintaining adequate vitamin D levels to potentially reduce NPC risk, while highlighting the need for caution regarding vitamin C supplementation in at-risk populations. Further research is essential to clarify the mechanisms underlying these relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.