Observational studyMedicine2025
Optimizing emergency nursing protocols to enhance outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A retrospective study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Emergency Department Process Optimization Combined With Health Education on the Treatment Outcomes and Anxiety and Depression in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2026Article
- Effect of a fast-track nursing pathway for emergency percutaneous coronary intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the impact of an optimized emergency nursing process on treatment outcomes, prognosis, patient satisfaction and analyzes the relationship between shortened rescue time and myocardial enzyme levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This retrospective study included 201 patients with AMI admitted to our hospital's emergency department between June 2022 and February 2024. Patients were divided into an observation group (n = 93), which received optimized emergency nursing care, and a control group (n = 108), which received standard care. The optimized nursing process encompassed prehospital emergency intervention, rapid transportation, in-hospital treatment, continuous monitoring, and psychological support. Data collected included rescue times, treatment effectiveness, anxiety and depression scores, patient satisfaction, and myocardial enzyme levels. The correlation between rescue time and myocardial enzyme levels was analyzed. Compared with the control group, the observation group demonstrated significantly shorter rescue times, including triage assessment and emergency electrocardiogram examination (P < .05). Clinical outcomes such as ST-segment resolution, chest pain relief, and myocardial enzyme normalization were notably better in the observation group (P < .05). A significant negative correlation was found between rescue time and myocardial enzyme levels in both groups, with correlation coefficients of -0.41 in the observation group and -0.29 in the control group. This indicates that shorter rescue times are associated with faster myocardial enzyme recovery. In addition, the observation group reported significantly lower anxiety and depression levels, higher hope scores, and greater patient satisfaction (P < .05). Optimizing the emergency nursing process significantly improves treatment outcomes and prognosis in patients with AMI by reducing rescue times, enhancing myocardial enzyme recovery, and improving psychological well-being and patient satisfaction. The significant negative correlation between rescue time and myocardial enzyme levels underscores the importance of rapid emergency care. These findings support the implementation of this optimized approach in clinical settings to improve AMI management and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.