Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40489855›Full record

ReviewMedicine2025

Usage of brolucizumab as treatment for wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV): A narrative review.

Siti Nursyazanie Jezani, Mae-Lynn Catherine Bastion

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recombinant Protein Drugs: A 2025 Update.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies in ophthalmology.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Siti Nursyazanie JezaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Malaysia.ORCID 0009-0001-8819-1088
Mae-Lynn Catherine BastionORCID 0000-0002-6856-8052

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) is the gold standard treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) which is responsible for central vision loss. This results in loss of quality of life, comparably severe to having coronary artery disease or cancer. New anti-VEGF agents need to address issues of potency and durability as existing agents tend to lose their effect after 1 month thus, requiring multiple injections at close intervals. Brolucizumab is one of the latest anti-VEGF agents clinically proven to treat nAMD after on-label agents namely, ranibizumab and aflibercept. Several clinical trials were conducted on Brolucizumab to ensure its safety and efficiency before it is approved to be used as treatment. Brolucizumab maintains and improves retinal edema in nAMD leading to improved vision with longer intervals possible between injections. However, it also has a risk of intraocular inflammation. This review summarizes the evidence for brolucizumab in the treatment of nAMD.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedChoroidal NeovascularizationWet Macular DegenerationHumansIntravitreal InjectionsPolypoidal Choroidal VasculopathyVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedbrolucizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Aage-related macular degenerationbrolucizumabpolypoidal choroidal vasculopathyvision loss

Identifiers

PMID40489855
PMCPMC12150977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.