Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40489850›Full record

ArticleMedicine2025

Comparative analysis of convolutional neural networks and vision transformers in identifying benign and malignant breast lesions.

Long Wang, Shu Fang, Xiaoxia Chen, Changjie Pan, Mingzhu Meng

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Long WangDepartment of Radiology, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Shu FangDepartment of Radiology, Changzhou Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaoxia ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Changjie PanDepartment of Radiology, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Mingzhu MengDepartment of Radiology, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhou, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou Medical Center, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

Changzhou Science and Technology Bureau (Applied Basic Research Program) CJ20220260Changzhou Science and Technology Bureau (Applied Basic Research Program) CJ20245032Jiangsu Provincial Health Commission Social Development Project CE202050471Nanjing Medical University Changzhou Medical Center (Clinical Project) CMCC202417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various deep learning models have been developed and employed for medical image classification. This study conducted comprehensive experiments on 12 models, aiming to establish reliable benchmarks for research on breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging image classification. Twelve deep learning models were systematically compared by analyzing variations in 4 key hyperparameters: optimizer (Op), learning rate, batch size (BS), and data augmentation. The evaluation criteria encompassed a comprehensive set of metrics including accuracy (Ac), loss value, precision, recall rate, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Furthermore, the training times and model parameter counts were assessed for holistic performance comparison. Adjustments in the BS within Adam Op had a minimal impact on Ac in the convolutional neural network models. However, altering the Op and learning rate while maintaining the same BS significantly affected the Ac. The ResNet152 network model exhibited the lowest Ac. Both the recall rate and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the ResNet152 and Vision transformer-base (ViT) models were inferior compared to the others. Data augmentation unexpectedly reduced the Ac of ResNet50, ResNet152, VGG16, VGG19, and ViT models. The VGG16 model boasted the shortest training duration, whereas the ViT model, before data augmentation, had the longest training time and smallest model weight. The ResNet152 and ViT models were not well suited for image classification tasks involving small breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging datasets. Although data augmentation is typically beneficial, its application should be approached cautiously. These findings provide important insights to inform and refine future research in this domain.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerBreastConvolutional Neural NetworksFemaleHumansROC Curvebreast lesionsconvolutional neural networkdeep learningimage classificationvision transformer

Identifiers

PMID40489850
PMCPMC12150958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.